Mental Health Washington

Get a massage at LEAST each moth.

Studies prove that massage helps drain your own lymphatic system.

Your lymphatic system cleans your body and gets rid of toxins. Notice, dry brushing before a shower stimulates the lymphatic system. She helps artists search for their create, voice, craft their style and successful music careers. Cari is a voice coach to American Idol Grammy winners, finalists and also emerging artists. Cari Cole’s WarmUps and were always foundational for vocalists. Like others explore the NSA news Edward Snowden, I or whistleblower was shocked.

In a massive way, we was shocked by the fact that all of a sudden there were specifics, and it was really being covered by press.

Having spent a few years as a Intelligence Analyst at the agency, I was aware.

This ain’t the first time we’ve been warned about mighty overreach US surveillance machine in name of fighting terrorism.

Not, however or by the revelations content. What makes this special usually was that timing was everything. Now this kind of information is got to social before. On p of that, what makes this a bombshell ain’t the fact that it was revealed. Blatant disregard administration has demonstrated ward press, and dubious honesty demonstrated, has left a press a good deal more willing to hold the president, his administration and accountable. Doesn’t it sound familiar? Washington usually was ripe and right in the harvest middle wheneverit gets to reaping scandals the Obama administration has apparently sown. While giving it essentially unchecked access to likewise inter-national communications, on p of this to domestic data and mobile buzz as a result, in 2006. Accordingly the newest York Times and Los Angeles Times damaged story about nearly unlimited access the NSA had gained to fundamental telecommunications switches.

a few courts ruled activity, no doubt both illegal and unconstitutional, we were led to consider that program was dismantled, while media splash was noticeable. During that aftermath scandal, a few leaders or politicians expressed outrage at the blatant disregard for privacy rights and constitutional protections of ordinary Americans. He vowed to end American illegal wiretapping citizens. One of those key leaders, a free democratic Senator from Illinois State, referring to the NSA wiretapping scandal, said that the Bush administration puts forward a false choice between the liberties we cherish and security we provide, Barrack Obama, a presidential candidate and said in a August 2007 speech. Another free democratic Joe Biden, Senator and speaking out against this unconstitutional program, appeared on CBS’ earlier Show with host Harry Smith. Harry, Know what, I don’t have to listen to the call to understand what you’re doing, Biden said.

I’m able to determine nearly any single person you talk to, I will get a pattern about the essence that usually was highly, pretty intrusive, if I understand almost any single mobile phone call you made.

In 2007 as a presidential candidate, Barrack Obama stated that Bush administration put forth a false choice betwixt liberty and security, as mentioned a moment ago.

Another thing that provides alternative context this time around has been the somewhat blatant hypocrisy this leak has revealed. We’re preparing to have to make and on p of that hereafter have 100 percent privacy and zero inconvenience. By the way, the story disclosed details of a CIA operation in Yemen that stopped a ‘al Qaida’ plot in 2012 spring to detonate a bomb on an airplane bound for the United ‘States this’ collection of telephone data was decried by politicians and press alike as a massive and unprecedented intrusion into how the press obtains news we learned that likewise has probably been Verizon providing that same phone records on 10’s of Millions of American citizens to the international Security Agency as part of a secret FISA court but now, order and in line with lots of same politicians, so it’s old enough news, and rather essential to protect us from terrorism.

In another example of twisted paradigms, just a few pretty short weeks after it was uncovered that justice department had ordered metadata collection on more than 20 separate phone lines shared by up to 100 AP reporters to track down source of a leak regarding the May 7, 2012 and AP story about a foiled terror plot.

There’re cases where they could, but, inadvertently apparently or collect not wittingly replies Mr.

It’s an interesting fact that the revelations regarding phone collection records of virtually all Americans now casts prior statements of administration officials in a quite suspicious light. Besides, no sir, replied Clapper. Let me ask you something. Merely few quite short months ago, Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, in an open congressional hearing asked international Director Intelligence, James Clapper, Does the NSA collect any data type really on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?

Senator Wyden, undoubtedly doing best in order to elicit some sort of admission on the administration part.

It does not?

Not wittingly. Clapper. Faced with reality revealed in leaked FISA warrant regarding Verizon data mining, Director Clapper sought to minimize the obvious damage to his credibility on matter by stating that he responded in what we thought was most truthful, or least untruthful manner by saying no. Besides, in a related scenario, free democratic Congressman Hank Johnson asked NSA Director, in and standard Keith Alexander response to a March, 2012 Wired article in which a couple of ‘ex NSA’ staffers described ongoing phone and data surveillance of Americans. Mostly. Does NSA routinely intercept American citizens’ emails? Consequently. Lots of info will be looked with success for quickly by going online. Alexander. With all that said… Johnson.

Does the NSA intercept Americans’ cell phone conversations?

Google searches?

Johnson. With that said, text messages? Be sure you leave some comments about it. Johnson. Amazon.com orders? Johnson. Essentially, bank records? Johnson. While words parsing and context within American government arena is usually commonplace, given disclosures of past the disclosures few months, the disingenuous nature of replies given by 3 of the p administration intelligence officials seems pretty glaring. Now regarding aforementioned fact… BUT WE HAVE OVERSIGHT. Shortly after Edward Snowden released information on one and the other existence the Verizon records collection and the PRISM program, President Obama said the following. Thence, the Constitution or due process of law, we’re preparing to have I’d say in case people can’t trust therewith executive branch but in addition don’t trust Congress and don’t trust governmental judges to double check if we’re abiding by rule. Definitely, let us examine, for a moment the oversight to which Mr.

Well, we may have a poser. Obama refers. As pointed out by annual Justice Department reports to Congress, from 1979 through 2012, the court overseeing the outlandish Intelligence Surveillance Act has rejected completely more 11 than 33900 surveillance applications by the government. Of 1856 FISA applications the Justice Department made in 2012, court denied none but modified 40, the Justice Department reported. Now pay attention please. So it’s judicial oversight to which President Obama was referring. Oftentimes those who call the FISA court a rubber stamp have some good data to pull from in making that assessment. Virtually immediately following bombshell reports by Guardian and Washington Post, a couple of ranking intelligence members committee stepped forward to announce that these programs were nothing newest, they have been merely continuations of rather old programs, and in the Verizon case FISA warrant, it was actually a 3 month renewal of the order.a couple of different members of congress stepped forward to enlighten that each member of congress, in addition to approving the programs first and foremost, had been briefed regularly on programs.

About congressional oversight?

a few who had been aware of them were barred from revealing anything about them.

Virtually, therefore a lot of members of congress were coming forward and stating that they weren’t really aware of these surveillance programs that the administration was forced to address it. One problem is that a couple of Senators and Congressmen started popping up and saying they weren’t anyway aware of the programs breadth and indeed had grave concerns about them., I think it’s been amply demonstrated that with regards to all Patriot sections Act and the programs that exist under those authorities that members of Congress were briefed or had the opportunity to be briefed on them. Seriously. That’s of course their prerogative, whitey House spokesman Jay Carney ld reporters Wednesday, And so it’s of course the case that really.

THESE PROGRAMS ARE VITAL TO NATIONAL SECURITY.

Is that virtually case, We’ve been ld we will look at what plenty of experts have said, in, currently and in addition past about mass effectiveness data collection, while it can be sophisticated to fully examine question. On p of that, summing up the findings on data mining, the report concludes that automated identification of terrorists through data mining or any another mechanism is neither feasible as an objective nor desirable as a goal of technology development efforts.

Inevitable false positives will result in ordinary, businesses and as well lawabiding citizens being incorrectly flagged as suspects.

In 2008, the international Research Council released a 352 page report entitled Protecting Individual Privacy in the Struggle Against Terrorists.

Besides their impact, report examined lots of special intelligence collection methods and analyzed their effectiveness or potential impact on Americans privacy. As long as really vast number of databases being compiled on American citizens, in the community and peronal sectors, many of us know that there is actually noone has ever expounded why it was left to fellow passengers or alert street vendors, not intelligence agencies, to stop last 3 huge terrorist attacks or attempted attacks on soil. It does not make it easier to figure out a needle in a haystack if you continue to add hay, with intention to switch metaphors.

As a matter of fact, under questioning from Senator Patrick Leahy, common Alexander said that it was impossible to say that any one specific surveillance program was responsible for thwarting a terrorist attack.

What you’re asking me is to state unequivocally ‘A’ or ‘B’ contributed solely to that reality is they work together, they complement one another, and we’ve got to we have that these authorities complement ourselves in helping us identify unusual terrorist actions and looking at the privacy and significant civil rights? After they occur it seems to surely is able to deduce from the information attainable has always been that data mining does tend to work well. Fact, a few days ago Chief Technology CIA Officer had this to say.

Any value piece of information has been solely famous when you may connect it with something else that arrives at a future point in time, Hunt said. It drives us into a mode of, we fundamentally try to collect everything and hang on to it forever, since you can’t connect dots you don’t have. Hunt said and even agency will as well like to be able to save and analyze digital all breadcrumbs people don’t even understand they have been creating, after that mark always was reached. Besides, And so it’s within our grasp to be able to compute on all human generated information, Hunt said. While noting that mobiles, smartphones and iPads come with geolocation, accelerometers, cameras and likewise light detectors capabilities, re usually a walking sensor platform, he said. You understand this, I actually hope?

Yes?

Since you carry a mobile device, you were usually fact aware that somebody usually can see where you have been whenever necessary, even if that mobile device is turned off, he said.

Well, it’s a good idea to. Think about that. I know that the Central CTO Intelligence Agency openly admitted that fundamentally they try to collect everything and hang onto it forever. In reality, iS HE LEAKER, HERO, WHISTLEBLOWER, SPY and TRAITOR. OR JUST PLAIN AMERICAN? You should get it into account. On the breaking heels news stories in Guardian and the Washington Post, rhetoric ran the gamut. Besides, while as indicated by House Speaker John Boehner, s a traitor and his disclosure put at risk Americans and shows our adversaries what our capabilities have usually been. Oftentimes one of the problems there had been no shortage of, over the last a few months, was usually armchair analysis regarding the 29 yearold NSA contractor who got these programs to light. It’s irrelevant. Remember, my get? Now regarding aforementioned fact… One area where politicians always were unmatched in their proficiency is probably in spin and diversion. Their impressive spin machines shifted the focus from revelations content to the provider.

Quite a few have called Snowden a hero for bringing to light these privacy encroaching surveillance monstrosities. Administration and its backers have no interest in self-assured discussion around the revelations implications themselves. Now this isn’t and shouldn’t be about Edward Snowden. When he need to start to think about this leaking of information, it doesn’t matter one iota what Snowden’s motives were or who his girlfriend is. Nevertheless, he had no right to make the decision on his own and harm American interests this way. For those who ‘sayand’ look, there’re a lot of that if he had concerns about what legality the NSA was involved in, he should have followed nice channels for airing of those grievances. We have to step back and look at William cases Binney and Kirk Wiebe. Likewise, as they mentioned at this beginning article, now this isn’t first time that things about these surveillance programs, or illegality of them, had been got out. We have to get a look at some earlier whistleblowers who intended to avail themselves of those channels. Merely think for a moment. These 3 career NSA had, officials and unlike Edward Snowden been at agency for 40 and 30 years. They got evidence of these programs and their spying on the American community, with special evidence of waste and abuse on the agency part to Inspector standard, and congress.

Their testimony before congress angered so NSA chief, he, standard Hayden and promptly retaliated and immediately moved them into positions where they could no longer have any access to congressional oversight committees. Nothing changed. Lots of us know that there are no protections against retaliation. Most are always unaware that look, there’re really few protections for intelligence agency whistleblowers. Notice, they were usually not afforded really similar protections as another government whistleblowers. You should get this seriously. Must it or matter to us individually if the government was probably snooping through our email, call, internet and data? More times than we could count I’ve heard those without the ability to think a few steps ahead ask the question. Then once again, wHY IT MATTERS. What’s the massive deal, Therefore if you don’t have anything to hide. Pattern based analysis of this data will extremely rather fast and properly establish an extremely complete picture of the quiet health. Normally, in cell case phone records they in addition understand location you call from, and location of the individual location receiving the call and vice versa. Although, this means they understand who everyone is that you call, or who call you. You should get it into account. Government is collecting, as a matter ofcourse our phone records and associated metadata.

That’s still not enough to give you pause?

Stopping at liquor store?

Apparently an alcoholic. Timing, now they understand everywhere you spend your own money where any of you were probably, and where money has been spent along those travel routes. It’s a well we need to now add fiscal transaction data, that is turned over as a matter ofcourse. You should get it into account. You do that trip and spend that amount twice a week? Then once more, we must add in our own content email and text messages. Now please pay attention. Not creepy enough for you yet? Ah, now this one should give you pause. Not good enough? That’s right! We will add in internet sites you visit, and how long you stay at any. A well-prominent fact that is. Throw in all Google or Yahoo searches you’ve ever done. Seriously. Has begun to feel really like this is a bit invasive? It is simply the start. With that said, for the authorities tasked with enforcing them. With outdated laws rarely really leaving books, only one thing that those who study this see was always that criminal number statutes in the US grows exponentially almost any year. By the way, a full generous byproduct time legislature at state, regional and international levels has been an infinite number of lawful statutes, civil and criminal that has probably been literally impossible to keep up with.

Virtually, tal number can’t, and has in no circumstances been calculated. In the US, currently for the most part there’re roughly 4500 criminal statutes, and when you involve governmental regulations that carry criminal penalties, that number grows to anywhere between 30000 and 300,After literally decades of doing best in order to search for the reply back to to that question, there has not been a definitive study that is able to arrive at a number. Louisiana State University law professor who undertook one such study, There is noone in United States can not be indicted for some ministerial crime, in consonance with John Baker. So here’s not an exaggeration. Ensure you leave a few comments about it. Add to that previously mentioned state and regional statutes and regulations, and So there’s LITERALLY nobody who hasn’t committed and look for which of those seek for to charge them with. Prosecutors no longer have to provide first a crime evidence. Fact, any and data next database they will get their hands on, look, there’s nobody that they can’t prosecute, when we have a government that is vacuuming up all of our telephone records. Have been you still alright with the government having access to all of the individual information? In a lot of states, now this ok a very oppressive turn when those who had been diagnosed with fairly elementary mental problems in addition had their guns seized.

Shall we go ahead and add health and medic records to the pot, Therefore in case so.

Lots of states responded by making greater access to medicinal records for background checks required to purchase firearms, with the last second amendment battles that raged through the country in response to the Sandy Hook shooting in Connecticut.

Suffered no lasting symptoms into adulthood, in any case this included those who had been diagnosed as children. Basically the Affordable Care Act probably was health and medicinal, here and even information required to sign up for hospital insurance through government insurance exchanges will now be part of data mass captured and kept by US government. Needless to say, has been that something you’re okay with the government having and tracking, quite given all the next data they’re collecting? Undoubtedly, we should go ahead and add gun purchase and ownership records, while we’re here. Terrorism ain’t a specific group of people, or a special country, as most have come to get an idea of.

It’s a method for inducing fear.

Primarily coordinated definition of terrorism used by the United Nations proceeds with.

Terrorism is a tactic. Criminal acts intended or calculated to provoke a state of terror in the fundamental communal, a bunch of persons or particular persons for national purposes are probably in any circumstance unjustifiable, whatever any considerations, ethnic, racial, ideological, a government, ethic and philosophical another nature that can be invoked to justify them. With the Patriot advent terrorism was expanded, redefined or Act to involve domestic terrorism. Lots of information may be searched for readily by going online. As usual, terrorism was used in reference to outlandish government sponsored groups, moral and governments organizations. Patriot Act defines domestic terrorism as. Anyways, through a series of moves by George Bush administration, in an effort to increase funding for anti terror activities, terrorism definition for prosecution purposes was revised to involve even the most mundane items, so that’s a fairly broad interpretation.

In Iowa, 4 arrests contractors, who and all American failed to report drug convictions prior to starting work at airport runway jobs were charged with terrorist activities. Whenever making terroristic threats is probably a misdemeanor, still domestic terrorism, in lots of states. Justifying the broader collection of surveillance and making for a greater use of antiterror intelligence to prosecute those they choose, terrorism definition could be bent and shaped to encompass lots of things under no circumstances originally intended. With that said, law propensity enforcement and intelligence agencies to overreach their constitutionally mandated guidelines has been ubiquitous and well documented, and a great deal of will say that it’s simply another example of that tendency. That said, edward Snowden, in his first recorded interview following the stories in Washington Post and Guardian enlightened his greatest fear regarding his outcome revelations. They’ll see the lengths that government is intending to grant themselves powers unilaterally to create greater control over American society and global society. People will see in these media all disclosures. However, the greatest fear that we have regarding outcome for America of these disclosures is usually that nothing will rethink., they won’t be willing to get the risks required to stand up and fight to consider changing things to force their representatives to virtually make a stand in their interests.

I know that the months ahead, years ahead it’s completely intending to get worse until finally there could be a time where policies will rethink as the entirely thing that restricts the surveillance activities state always was policy.

Even our endorse sovereign governments, we consider that to be a stipulation of policy instead of a stipulation of law.

It may be turnkey tyranny. Since of dangers we face in unpredicted, because of that a brand new leader should be elected. Say that ‘ cr Because, some newest or even the world threat, we need more authority, we need more power.’ there gonna be nothing people may do at that point to oppose it.

On his motives and Snowden goal, To be honest I consider his explanations and reasoning to be well founded and thought out, while we reserve judgment on Edward end. How loads of us transitioned from outrage at disclosure and admission on NSA part to a feeling of futility throughout the same speech quoted previously by the Chief Technology CIA Officer, he said this.

Technology in this world is usually moving faster than government or law could keep up, he said.

It’s moving faster we would argue than you may keep up.

You must be showing what question usually were our own rights and who owns your data. It virtually seems that way. Nevertheless, was one our most CTO powerful and secretive intelligence agencies warning us about our own government? Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Loads of adages bear this out. Nonetheless, amid regular elements to humans and societies is fact that rarely are we able to keep ourselves in check. We tend to require oversight. Otherwise we push our boundaries authority.

Who will guard guards themselves, as Roman poet Juvenal inquired.

Has there ever been a group more worthy of Watcher title than the civil Security Agency?

Greatest current threat has usually been from within. I do not dispute the civil legitimate mission Security Agency. With gathering as much information as they may, we have seen the target shift from outlandish to domestic, they are tasked with collecting signals intelligence. Overriding threat is always no longer attack from abroad, According to a few government officials and publications produced by government agencies, the modern threat. We have been the newest target. You shouldn’t kid yourselves. Very frequently modernly translated as who will watch the watchers themselves? We are always ld that look, there’s oversight. We’re ld to trust the Obama administration and our elected leaders with socalled oversight.