Recipients of services, patients and families, wisely seek for to be informed partners in their health care.
Data on the performance of providers also must be publicly available, comprehensible and meaningful.
Nothing about us without us is one way this had been articulated. For this to happen, medical information must be transparent and comprehensible. Continuity of therapy is a vital component of quality care for people with serious mental illnesses and must be given more attention by consumers themselves, family members, advocates, providers, administrators, and researchers alike.
They are as follows.
Important strides been made in identifying the specific factors which promote continuity of therapy -it is time to seize this important opportunity as a similar stepping stone to achieving the transformation of America’s mental health care system for the benefit of consumers and their families, our communities, and our Nation. So a roundtable of mental health experts has developed a set of nine recommendations for enhancing continuity of medication therapy for persons with schizophrenia or serious mental illness, including schizophrenia. Remember, at the moment, loads of us are aware that there is an important opportunity to develop a national consensus statement on the key concepts and practice standards that must form the basis of a continuum of therapy designed to provide realistic assurance that consumers can access vital medications when and where they are needed.
Encourage collaborations between hospitals and community based organizations. Use fiscal incentives to foster collaborations including the standardization of information and shared electronic health records. Use a quality improvement approach to enhance continuity of therapy by benchmarking at the organizational level performance and outcomes standards regarding continuity of care. Then, ensure all consumers have an amount of care management for the transition from inpatient to community. Care management services gonna be reimbursable by all payers and the disincentives to providing it going to be removed. Hospitals and community providers should focus on the Pull Model of transition from inpatient to outpatient care. Provider organizations should focus on staff competency in engagement and strategies and motivational interviewing. Actually the Pull Model focuses on involving community based providers in the transition planning process from the start. Nonetheless, accreditation standards will be aligned to address and improve continuity of therapy in. Therefore this may include developing standards to ensure evidence of an active process of care management and transition between levels of care, a quality review of the success of transition plans, and measuring engagement. Consumers and their families gonna be educated about the pros of maintaining their personal health care history.
Ensuring that consumers have detailed information about their illnesses and treatment history will So options here range from simple paper and pencil logs and medication histories to electronic records on memory sticks. More thoughtful use of inpatient services could lead to a reduction in emergency room use and ultimately to a decrease in the amount of hospitalizations. Basically, consumerdriven recovery planning should include and the appropriate and necessary use of hospitalization. Populationbased data going to be shared with all stakeholders, including families and consumers to aid in enhancing the system of care. Loads of payers and public entities collect both population and individual specific information about mental health consumers and services. Parties who collect data about mental health services and performance should share it with appropriate stakeholders in usable and timely ways.
There might be meaningful involvement of consumers and their advocates in all levels of system delivery and evaluation.
Global involvement of consumers and their advocates in the care delivery process is essential.
While involvement in developing and implementing performance measurement and evaluation, examples include using peer specialists as part of a treatment team, active involvement in policy and planning. For instance, an unacceptably high number of people with serious psychiatric problems -including schizophrenia, depression and bipolar disorder -are falling between the cracks in the transition between acute inpatient settings and the community causing harm and disruption in their own lives and those of their families and often bringing their recovery process to a halt. Barriers and similar impediments to ensuring this continuum of care was long entrenched in mental health and related care systems, while we have learned that maintaining continuity of therapy has a positive impact on consumer outcomes. Needless to say, both of these likely outcomes of continuity of therapy provide cost reductions for the hospital and cost offset for the investments in continuity of therapy initiative and related therapies. Now, a continuity of therapy initiative have a lot of chances to decrease inappropriate use of emergency room services by consumers with schizophrenia and akin serious mental illnesses by assuring consistency in the disease management approach used by all community provider organizations.