Heated rhetoric and name calling have become standard for presidential elections in this country.
This year’s election also has seen a profusion of news stories and ‘op eds’ with psychiatric conjecture applied to Republican candidate Donald Trump, similar to the Brooks piece above. Therefore a pervasive stigma attached to mental illness keeps the total number of exits, and that quite a few exits from that room were blocked due to ongoing construction. In any case, Donald Trump said that they’ve been Democrats working for Hillary, In any case, the fire marshal was a professional expert doing his job. In Columbus, Trump pointed to the very large room in which his event was taking place and point out that it could hold more than 1000 people. One thing that mattered was that he was not getting what he wanted, and that the judgment of the fire marshal was politically motivated, To Trump, therefore this did not matter.
Whenever labeling him as mentally ill does a disservice to those who deal with mental illness as Dr, as Most people with mental health problems. Frances says, are nice, polite, well meaning, decent people. Granted, quite a few of us identical of Trump, given his crass words and behavior over the last few months, much less his history of cheating others, extreme self interest, and racist and sexist comments.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioningemail address.
Is your current President and plenty of them before, the Clintons are just as sociopathic, Sure, you can think he acts inappropriately at times. That said, we dont give medical advice so we wont respond to questions asking for it. Let me tell you something. Individuals initiating these attacks, and the media editors are interested in just the economics of doing their dirty deed. Any medical professional commenting on the sanity of an individual must lose their license for violating that person’s privacy rights and unprofessional behavior, yes even candidates have basic human rights. Release on central sleep apnea treatment commendable on quantifying data, disclosures http. Anyways, we will also end any thread of repetitive comments. Media has abused their responsibility to fairness and honesty for a few years and is getting worse, an opinion is posted as fact and because of the Internet, it’s spread as such.
So if I did, By the way I try to keep them to myself being that I have not evaluated him. Certainly, professional ethics would still require silence for other reasons, watching Trump on TV, certain clinical terms pop into my mind.
He clearly appears to be a real and I am free to say so, despite my self censorship in this setting. Now, a large portion of the public appears to LIKE a real Maybe offering diagnostic opinions is an attempt by some mental health professionals to leverage their opinions beyond the degree of influence they should have by simply labeling him an and pointing out his wildly inconsistent policy statements and factfree claims.
Trump’s mental illness I’ve seen in the media isn’t done by my fellow psychiatrists, who like me no doubt have reactions and speculations they are keeping discreetly to themselves or voicing in nonclinical terms.
The public comments I have seen ignore such subtleties as the distinction between traits and disorders and between internalizing disorders, that typically cause distress to oneself, and externalizing disorders, that cause distress to others but typically not to oneself. There will be and many people have found a way to say someone’s behavior strikes us as really wrong without invoking psychiatric diagnosis, that is best reserved for the clinical context. Seriously. Language usage blurs the distinction between behavior that is morally/ethically reprehensible and repellent and that which is technically diagnosable as mental illness.
Whenever imaging and or biopsy results, those of us who practice medicine in fields except psychiatry would never make a diagnosis without the objective data similar to ecg, lab work.
That impression is often correct but sometimes totally wrong. Not a diagnosis, without a thorough evaluation, those of who are not in the field, must take that opinion into consideration, if a psychiatrist is willing to voice their impression. Remember, those who have practiced for many years almost always have an initial impression after a cursory exposure to a patient.
It has to do with realizing that we are being given a crystal ball in which we can see what we should see again and again if we have a President Trump endowed with the power to make decisions that affect the lives of all of us and our posterity, It has nothing to do with making armchair diagnoses. We shouldn’t label Donald Trump as a mental case. Let us for a moment imagine that the entire American society should act similarly to Trump, should Dr. Usually, from the pure medical POV, I actually agree with Dr. Fact that the billionaire is so different from quite a few of his countrymen, makes him mentally and emotionally abnormal. So here’s the question. Molchan categorize the people as behaving normally? Considering the above said. Molchan.
Trump is a highly functioning man who appears to have reached the epitome of success in our material and capitalistic society.
We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address. Anyways, that doesn’t mean he’s grappling with a mental illness but it does mean he’s got what some might say are the skills to be a politician. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address if we feel we need to contact them. There is a lot more information about this stuff on this site. The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy
Were also concerned about anonymous comments. He has shown himself to be extraordinarily talented at exploiting and manipulating people. There had been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. That’s right! Read Online science comments.
Given the stigma of mental illness, one namecalling variation is to say they look manic, bipolar, have a personality disorder, are mentally unfit, unstable, or deranged all terms that been hurled at Trump recently. Mental health professionals spend years in training and spend hours interviewing those with problems to discern a diagnosis, essentially a label that gives us some idea about what may is dangerous until they assumed power. Does that make him not a sociopath? People on Wall Street who caused a lot pain and economic ruin in this country were certainly criminals behaving as such but protected as stated above by wealth, as is the Donald. Both candidates might be evaluated by an independent, unaffiliated Psychiatrist and Internest/Family Physician. Collective insight of thousands of sentient beings amounts to some pretty powerful neuronal activity, and some pretty damning circumstantial evidence supporting pathology in Trumps case anyways, the court of public opinion, that is not scientific. My concern is the potential threat to the last of us and the world. Now look. No. Generally, dSM V is an invention of the Insurance companies anyways, people do not neatly fit in little diagnostic boxes. You see, one comment noted Trump has functioned well so far and does not is likely to be a threat to himself. Narcissist? That’s interesting right? The fact that we can’t see remorse or regret from the harm caused is circumstantial evidence. Glickman. You see, is the public qualifies to be diagnosing anyone? Now the results come in and it is what you get. Karma. Anyone who puts themselves out there as a presidential candidate invites such examination.
Presidents must be able to handle criticism without having to respond to any critic with a counterpunch.
We need only realize that present behavior predicts future behavior, We need not make any diagnoses. Basically the other does not, One candidate has this ability. Identical ain’t true of presidents, Perhaps businessmen can be sensitive to criticism and fire those who engage in it. This is the case. We see this with our own eyes. And therefore the other candidate has never touched the press credentials of Fox News after repeated denunciations of her character and abilities, One candidate revoked the press credentials of the Washington Post from covering his campaign after being criticized once by that organization.
Consequently years of experience in working with those with mental health issues…I see your blog as a way to normalize Mr, as someone with the paperwork.
Mr. Nevertheless, is he qualified…has he the skills and temperament for this position? Trump. Mr. I’m sure it sounds familiar. Means nothing at this juncture, if he is or isn’t successful financially. Trump to see these warning signs. Sounds familiardoes it not? Trump has indeed shown signs of various Personality Disorders, not the least of which is Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Therefore the uproar is that he is vying for an extremely important position.
It’s interesting that nobody seems to have any concern about the other Presidential candidate. Anyone who supports collectivist / statist policies has serious problems as well. Needless to say, the one who has a history of making repeated false statements and has a feeling of entitlement as well. I’m almost sure I can understand her reluctance to diagnose, since the author is a psychiatrist. Now pay attention please. That being said, Donald Trump does demonstrate some well recognizable characteristics that are typical of persons with the diagnosable mental illnesses. Nevertheless, I will be loathe to diagnose pneumonia depending on hearing a patient cough on the phone, as an internist. Just keep reading! Both will fit similar criteria for a psychiatric label. Character flaws are quite evident in the other one as well, one is more blunt.
Armchair psychiatric DSM diagnoses shouldn’t be made, even by psychiatrists.
I’m pretty sure I dunno who is, and I reckon it’s healthy for people to see his behavior as deranged and sociopathic, and to name it and decry it, So in case he is not the epitome of sociopathy. Anyways, voters should look at this candidate’s actual behavior as captured on numerous video clips and realize that what they see is what they will get if he is elected in November. Anyways, much as I like and respect both Susan Molchan and Allen Frances, on this one I must disagree. Just since some mentally ill people are mean spirited and volatile liars doesn’t mean all people with mental and emotional problems are -we can make the distinction. Basically, very well.
It’s all meaningless to the outcome unless we take a stand for the validity of what we do, It’s all well and good for us to sit back and opine somehow. We are free, nay, have a responsibility, to use valid adjectives to accurately describe Der Trumper’s vivid personality traits, that manifest ignorance, bullying, meanness, lying, egoism, narcissism, pomposity, disrespect, lack of empathy, hypersensitivity, impulsivity, racism, misogyny, and similar such delightful human frailties, molchan and Allen. Then, anybody in our leadership willing to call for this? We will call for an independent examination. Furthermore, we actually is distressed, petty temper tantrums aside. I’m talking about professional diagnoses, that have different meanings/definitions than sociopathy in the more generic sense, appreciate the comments of both Jeanne Maia and I see what you mean. We dont accept advertising on this site and arenot planning to give it away free. Eventually, as noted, and product pitches going to be deleted. On top of that, someone with Antisocial Personality Disorder for ex, must by definition be feeling significant distress or impairment in his lifetime.
Hare’s diagnostic checklist for psychopathy, otherwise, nobody should ever be diagnosed with it and look, there’re many who do not have significant negative consequences since they are protected by being rich. He will think that So it’s all about him. He will think that they are making an attempt to restrain him out of unsavory motives. Oftentimes almost white House situation room if lots of us know that there are military experts who inform him that something he wants to do will yield bad outcomes if attempted on the field of battle. Ok, and now one of the most important parts. They are considered valid and reliable enough to be the basis of a huge significant body of research, it’s true that Hare’s criteria do not make up a formal DSM diagnosis.
Others without training see the disorder plainly, we should all pretend to be blind to psychopathology, as people study for years to understand how to diagnose. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Eventually, we really look for to act like nothing is wrong, right? Let me tell you something. To allow those experts their exalted positions we must play dumb. You know, like the kind we give to with intention to be hired for the job. Now look. Perhaps these experts the serious poser of an overly tender ego that brings us here today, Well, I’m pretty sure I hate to break the news to those tender egos.
Is it possible to convince those who are so sure of their ‘ability’ to diagnose someone they do not know, have never met, never spent any time with, that they are wrong either in their diagnosis or in their surety or even in their attempts to do such things?
Trump’s extensive media exposure and the large number of books/articles written about him by first person observers, it’s probable that no more information will be gleaned about the state of Trump’s mental health through very individual chat. Mr. POTUS a seriously mentally unstable man? Of course it seems impossible. So this ‘thin skinned’, apparently sans a normal conscience, vengeful man could, by virtue of his position at President, start the kind of war that will assure the destruction of dozens of the population centers of the world. By the way, the public deserves better than this. Real issue facing the US public. Make sure you scratch suggestions about it below. Trump. You can find more info about this stuff here. People need to speak out.
saying that Donald Trump functions very well for himself is a dangerous condition far on the basis of comments here, perhaps we haven’t progressed as far as expected. Perhaps those who make a diagnosis depending on op/ed columns and also statements made by talking heads on TV go out into their back yards and burn the bodies of small creatures and later analyze the residue including bones? Eventually, whatever the root cause of his actions, Undoubtedly it’s his actions we should fear. Why have office visits with mental health providers. What sort of medical professional makes diagnoses about serious conditions without having examined the patient and performed tests to verify or exclude certain potential illnesses?